Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support named callback args not wrapped in a list #1375

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 20, 2020

Conversation

alexcjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexcjohnson alexcjohnson commented Aug 20, 2020

Fixes #1366
I opted to allow any of the callback args to be provided as a list or not, rather than a narrower fix of just the output=Output(...) regression. My rationale is it's unambiguous what the user means, so there's no harm accepting it.

  • I have run the tests locally and they passed. (refer to testing section in contributing)
  • I have added tests, or extended existing tests, to cover any new features or bugs fixed in this PR
  • I have added entry in the CHANGELOG.md


args, kwargs = make_args(
Output("out1", "children"), Input("in", "children"), State("state", "children")
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😀

Copy link
Contributor

@Marc-Andre-Rivet Marc-Andre-Rivet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💃 What's not to like? This fix is 99% comments and tests! :shipit:

@alexcjohnson alexcjohnson merged commit c68bcc2 into dev Aug 20, 2020
@alexcjohnson alexcjohnson deleted the 1366-named-output-arg branch August 20, 2020 02:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Regression on callbacks using name argument output=Output(...)
2 participants