Make the script a module for PyPi #58
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
My suggestion is to respect the XDG specs to not pollute the home directory for those who have set the XDG_DATA_HOME env variable. |
|
Is this set by default? Or should we check if it exists. |
|
Hmm, I think better idea would be to require the output flag. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Make the script a "module" for PyPi, while not having to change anything. main.py will still run the script normally, so running from source doesn't change at all.
Docs were updated as well for the new features. It outputs debs into
~/.permasigner/output.Current issues
~/.permasigner?Might be better to clone the repo intoWas a better idea to include it in the package.~/.permasigner.