Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add missing deps #821

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

chilingling
Copy link
Member

@chilingling chilingling commented Sep 27, 2024

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added new dependencies to enhance functionality in both the mockServer and engine-cli template designer projects.
    • Introduced concurrently for improved task management.
  • Updates

    • Updated minimum version requirements for Node.js and npm to ensure compatibility with newer features and improvements.
    • Updated vite version for better performance in the engine-cli template designer project.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications to the package.json files for the mockServer project and the packages/engine-cli/template/designer directory. Key changes include the addition of new dependencies, updates to engine version requirements, and the removal of outdated dependencies. The mockServer now requires newer versions of Node and npm, while the designer template consolidates its development dependencies.

Changes

File Change Summary
mockServer/package.json Added @babel/runtime dependency (^7.9.2), updated Node engine requirement (>= 16), updated npm requirement (>= 6), removed @babel/runtime from devDependencies.
packages/engine-cli/template/designer/package.json Added @opentiny/tiny-engine-vite-config and @opentiny/tiny-engine-mock (latest), added concurrently (^8.2.0), removed previous entries for @opentiny/tiny-engine-vite-config and @opentiny/tiny-engine-mock.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: add vite-config package #558: The changes in this PR involve adding a new dependency @opentiny/tiny-engine-vite-config, which is relevant as the main PR also involves updates to dependencies in package.json.
  • feat(cli): add build script & update template #582: This PR updates the template and includes changes to the package.json file, which aligns with the main PR's focus on modifying dependencies in mockServer/package.json.
  • fix: mockServer build and add startup script on template #616: This PR adds a new dependency @opentiny/tiny-engine-mock in the designer template's package.json, which is related to the main PR's changes in the mockServer/package.json.
  • bump deps version #816: This PR updates the versions of dependencies in multiple package.json files, including changes to vite, which is relevant to the main PR's updates in mockServer/package.json.

🐇 In the garden, changes bloom,
New dependencies chase away gloom.
Engines updated, fresh and bright,
In the code, everything feels right!
With every hop, we celebrate,
A better path, oh, how great! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 389ba8e and 0720f07.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • mockServer/package.json (2 hunks)
  • packages/engine-cli/template/designer/package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • mockServer/package.json
  • packages/engine-cli/template/designer/package.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added bug Something isn't working refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature labels Sep 27, 2024
@chilingling chilingling added the ready_for_review This PR requires more reviews label Sep 27, 2024
yy-wow
yy-wow previously approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@yy-wow yy-wow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

gene9831
gene9831 previously approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@gene9831 gene9831 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/engine-cli/template/designer/package.json (1)

25-26: Consider pinning versions for better stability

The changes align with the PR objectives of adding missing dependencies. However, using "latest" for @opentiny/tiny-engine-vite-config and @opentiny/tiny-engine-mock may lead to potential instability if breaking changes are introduced in future updates.

Consider pinning these dependencies to specific versions for better stability and reproducibility. For example:

- "@opentiny/tiny-engine-vite-config": "latest",
- "@opentiny/tiny-engine-mock": "latest",
+ "@opentiny/tiny-engine-vite-config": "^1.0.0",
+ "@opentiny/tiny-engine-mock": "^1.0.0",

Replace ^1.0.0 with the actual latest stable versions of these packages.

The addition of concurrently and maintaining the vite version are good practices.

Also applies to: 29-30

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d327eaf and 389ba8e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • mockServer/package.json (2 hunks)
  • packages/engine-cli/template/designer/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/engine-cli/template/designer/package.json (1)

25-26: Changes align with PR objectives and summary

The modifications to the package.json file are consistent with the PR objectives of adding missing dependencies and the AI-generated summary. The addition of @opentiny/tiny-engine-vite-config, @opentiny/tiny-engine-mock, and concurrently addresses the stated goal of fixing missing dependencies.

Also applies to: 29-30

mockServer/package.json (2)

34-34: LGTM: Correct addition of @babel/runtime as a dependency

The addition of @babel/runtime as a runtime dependency is correct. This ensures that the package is available in production environments, which is necessary for the transpiled code to run properly.


73-74: Verify the intention behind the significant engine version updates

The engine requirements have been substantially updated:

  • Node.js: from ">= 7.8.0" to ">= 16"
  • npm: from ">= 4.2.0" to ">= 6"

While using Node.js 16 (an LTS version) is good for stability, this is a significant jump that might introduce breaking changes for users on older versions.

Please confirm if this update is intentional and aligns with the project's compatibility goals. Consider the following:

  1. Are there new features or dependencies that require these higher versions?
  2. Has the impact on existing users been evaluated?
  3. Is there a migration guide or documentation update planned to help users upgrade?

@chilingling chilingling dismissed stale reviews from gene9831 and yy-wow via 0720f07 September 27, 2024 08:30
Copy link
Collaborator

@yy-wow yy-wow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@gene9831 gene9831 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hexqi hexqi merged commit 046dca4 into opentiny:refactor/develop Sep 28, 2024
2 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2024
14 tasks
yy-wow pushed a commit to yy-wow/tiny-engine that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2024
14 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 26, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working ready_for_review This PR requires more reviews refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants