-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix:table slot edit params should not get alert #802
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@chilingling has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the slot management functions within the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/common/component/MetaJsSlot.vue (1)
137-138
: Maintain Consistent Parameter Order in Function DefinitionsThe
setParams
function currently defines parameters as(slot, idx)
, whereas other functions liketoggleSlot
andvalidParams
use(idx, slot)
. For consistency and better readability, consider changing the parameter order insetParams
to(idx, slot)
.Apply this diff to adjust the parameter order:
--- a/packages/common/component/MetaJsSlot.vue +++ b/packages/common/component/MetaJsSlot.vue @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ - const setParams = (slot, idx) => { + const setParams = (idx, slot) => { slot.bind && toggleSlot(idx, slot, true) } @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ if (!tips) { - setParams(slot, idx) + setParams(idx, slot) } }) }Also, update any calls to
setParams
accordingly.Also applies to: 144-144
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/common/component/MetaJsSlot.vue (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
packages/common/component/MetaJsSlot.vue (1)
95-95
: Enhance User Experience withisSetParams
Parameter intoggleSlot
The addition of the
isSetParams
boolean parameter to thetoggleSlot
function allows for conditional execution of the confirmation modal. This prevents the modal from appearing when parameters are set programmatically, improving the user experience by streamlining interactions.Also applies to: 115-115
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/common/component/MetaJsSlot.vue (2)
98-98
: Typographical Error in CommentThere's a typo in the comment on line 98. The phrase "不根新在jsslot中的数据非响应式" should be corrected to "不更新在jsslot中的数据非响应式" to improve readability.
Line range hint
164-166
: Handle Undefined Component Names incomponentsMap
In the
watchEffect
, ifcomponentName
is not incomponentsMap
,state.currentComponent
will beundefined
. This could lead to errors ifstate.currentComponent
is expected to havecontent
andicon
properties.Consider providing a default value to handle cases where
componentName
is not found:watchEffect(() => { const componentName = useCanvas().getCurrentSchema()?.componentName - state.currentComponent = componentsMap[componentName] + state.currentComponent = componentsMap[componentName] || { + content: '', + icon: null + } })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/common/component/MetaJsSlot.vue (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/common/component/MetaJsSlot.vue (2)
20-26
: Correction of Validator and Function NamesGreat job updating the validator and function names from
parmasStringValidator
toparamsStringValidator
andvalidParmas
tovalidParams
. This improves code readability and prevents potential confusion.
176-177
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUnused Return Value:
componentsMap
May Not Need to Be ReturnedThe
componentsMap
object is returned from thesetup
function but is not used in the template. Since it's only used internally within thewatchEffect
, you may not need to return it.Consider removing
componentsMap
from the returned object if it's not used in the template:return { toggleSlot, slotList, paramsPropPath, slotRef, paramsStringValidator, validParams, state, - componentsMap }
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
* fix:table notch saving error message * fix: change slotparams cause warning * fix: change by review * fix: typo parma -> param --------- Co-authored-by: chilingling <michaelchiling1024@gmail.com>
* fix:table notch saving error message * fix: change slotparams cause warning * fix: change by review * fix: typo parma -> param --------- Co-authored-by: chilingling <michaelchiling1024@gmail.com>
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: #764
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes