Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(registry): metapp in registry support configuration in array format #625

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

feat(registry): metapp in registry support configuration in array format #625

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

gene9831
Copy link
Collaborator

@gene9831 gene9831 commented Jul 3, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced registry data processing to handle array formats for configurations, providing more flexibility in managing registry entries.

  • Tests

    • Introduced tests to validate the behavior of the new preprocessing feature to ensure reliable handling of various configurations.

@gene9831 gene9831 changed the title refactor: metapp in registry support configuration in array format feat(registry): metapp in registry support configuration in array format Jul 3, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The update introduces a preprocessRegistry function in the common.js file of the packages/register/src directory. This function handles preprocessing of registry data to correctly manage array formats for specific configurations. Additionally, the function is integrated into the defineEntry method in entryHash.js. New tests are provided to validate the functionality of preprocessRegistry.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/register/src/common.js Added preprocessRegistry function to preprocess registry data, transforming array formats for specific entries.
packages/register/src/entryHash.js Integrated preprocessRegistry into defineEntry, ensuring registry data is preprocessed before assignment.
packages/register/test/preprocessRegistry.test.js Introduced tests for preprocessRegistry, validating its behavior with different configuration formats.

Poem

In code we twist and turn,
For registry's sake, arrays we churn.
From common paths, a new routine,
Preprocess smart, keep entries clean.
Cheers to changes, swift and bright,
🐰✨ Registry shines with preprocess light!

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c71520 and 863fdcc.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/register/src/common.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/register/src/entryHash.js (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/register/src/entryHash.js (1)

83-84: Ensure correctness of preprocessRegistry function.

The call to preprocessRegistry appears correct. However, verify that preprocessRegistry processes the registry data as expected.

packages/register/src/common.js (1)

145-167: Ensure correctness of preprocessRegistry function.

The preprocessRegistry function preprocesses the registry data to handle array formats. Verify that it processes the data as expected.

packages/register/src/entryHash.js Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/register/src/common.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 863fdcc and 5d3766f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/register/test/preprocessRegistry.test.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
packages/register/test/preprocessRegistry.test.js (5)

5-17: Test case approved: Normal configuration without array format

The test case correctly verifies that preprocessRegistry handles a normal configuration without array format.

19-32: Test case approved: Transform array format configuration for single entry

The test case correctly verifies that preprocessRegistry transforms an array format configuration for a single entry.

34-50: Test case approved: Transform array format configuration for multiple entries

The test case correctly verifies that preprocessRegistry transforms an array format configuration for multiple entries.

52-62: Test case approved: Do not transform invalid array formats

The test case correctly verifies that preprocessRegistry does not transform invalid array formats.

64-74: Test case approved: Handle empty arrays

The test case correctly verifies that preprocessRegistry handles empty arrays.

chilingling
chilingling reviewed Jul 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
packages/register/src/common.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/register/src/common.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d3766f and 9ea66e2.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/register/src/common.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/register/test/preprocessRegistry.test.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/register/test/preprocessRegistry.test.js

packages/register/src/common.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ea66e2 and f4b9324.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/register/src/common.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/register/src/common.js

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f4b9324 and 0ac3d14.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/register/src/common.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/register/src/common.js

@gene9831 gene9831 added enhancement New feature or request ready to merge This PR is ready to be merged. labels Jul 10, 2024
@chilingling chilingling merged commit 9bb2792 into opentiny:refactor/develop Jul 11, 2024
1 check passed
@gene9831 gene9831 deleted the refactor/registry-extension branch August 13, 2024 09:44
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2024
Merged
14 tasks
yy-wow pushed a commit to yy-wow/tiny-engine that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
@gene9831
feat(registry): metapp in registry support configuration in array for…
ef7a939 
…mat (opentiny#625)

* refactor: metapp in registry support configuration in array format

* feat: add unit tests for preprocessRegistry function

* feat: remove array format configuration for single entry

* fix: remove redundant condition

* fix: add check array condition
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@chilingling chilingling chilingling approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ready to merge This PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@gene9831 @chilingling