Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HOSTEDCP-1709: hack/test: remove timeouts #4169

Merged

Conversation

stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

The top-level go test timeout does nothing beneficial for us - we need to be well-formed in the face of SIGTERM from the test platform anyway, and we need to time out within our tests, not from the top-level, as this will give us sensible test failure output (e.g. a specific assertion failed) versus the current panic output which makes it impossible to generate jUnit.

/assign @sjenning

The top-level `go test` timeout does nothing beneficial for us - we need
to be well-formed in the face of SIGTERM from the test platform anyway,
and we need to time out within our tests, not from the top-level, as
this will give us sensible test failure output (e.g. a specific
assertion failed) versus the current panic output which makes it
impossible to generate jUnit.

Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 6, 2024

@stevekuznetsov: This pull request references HOSTEDCP-1709 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

The top-level go test timeout does nothing beneficial for us - we need to be well-formed in the face of SIGTERM from the test platform anyway, and we need to time out within our tests, not from the top-level, as this will give us sensible test failure output (e.g. a specific assertion failed) versus the current panic output which makes it impossible to generate jUnit.

/assign @sjenning

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 6, 2024
@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

sjenning commented Jun 6, 2024

/area testing
/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added area/testing Indicates the PR includes changes for e2e testing and removed do-not-merge/needs-area labels Jun 6, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from enxebre and sjenning June 6, 2024 15:25
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the area/ci-tooling Indicates the PR includes changes for CI or tooling label Jun 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 6, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sjenning, stevekuznetsov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jun 6, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 5c959bf and 2 for PR HEAD 7688ecf in total

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 6, 2024

@stevekuznetsov: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure 7688ecf link false /test e2e-azure

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 2072710 into openshift:main Jun 7, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/ci-tooling Indicates the PR includes changes for CI or tooling area/testing Indicates the PR includes changes for e2e testing jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants