Increase timeout waiting for image-service #4871
Conversation
Because we have 2 more CPU archs supported by the image-service (which results in 4 more images served) we probably need more time for the image-service to come healthy. This increases it by 10 minutes, hopefully making it more stable.
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/XS
|
/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
openshift-ci
bot
removed
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
/hold |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4871 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 67.78% 67.79%
=======================================
Files 202 202
Lines 30093 30095 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 20398 20402 +4
+ Misses 7888 7887 -1
+ Partials 1807 1806 -1
|
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: adriengentil, osherdp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/unhold |
openshift-ci
bot
removed
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
/test subsystem-aws |
|
@rccrdpccl: The specified target(s) for
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
sorry wrong PR 😓 |
|
@osherdp: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/cherry-pick cloud_hotfix_releases |
|
@osherdp: new pull request created: #4877 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-ocm-2.7 |
|
@eliorerz: new pull request created: #4889 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This reverts commit 9bb181d.
Because we have 2 more CPU archs supported by the image-service (which results in 4 more images served) we probably need more time for the image-service to come healthy. This increases it by 10 minutes, hopefully making it more stable.
…penshift#5001) This reverts commit 9bb181d.
Because we have 2 more CPU archs supported by the image-service (which results in 4 more images served) we probably need more time for the image-service to come healthy:
(see https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_release/35207/rehearse-35207-pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-cloud_hotfix_releases-e2e-metal-assisted-lvm/1612076660142641152)
This increases it by 10 minutes, hopefully making it more stable.
List all the issues related to this PR
What environments does this code impact?
How was this code tested?
Checklist
docs, README, etc)Reviewers Checklist