You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the ideal scenario for using this feature?
I have an interesting nosqlbench use case that implies Linearized operations as stated on devdocs/linearized/linearized.md
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In the use case, we are using a clustering column which usually contains 20 values per partition key in a table . Algorithm is :
Partition-key based read on table A
Foreach (ck), Do a select in another table.
I can mitigate the problem for now, since I control data through a rampup phase, I can
reuse bindings for main phase.
I'm just thinking of how I could have done it without "knowing" table data.
I understood that "linearized" is design sketch only for now.
in inject syntax, it is stated :
The variable is assumed to be a single-valued type.
It's a logical limitation considering presented capture syntax.
I like the simplicity of the proposed syntax and don't think it should be changed.
I think this problem could be solved using, somehow, specific configs on statement or block that would both specify :
declarative dependency between statement 2 and statement 1
handling of resultset: first, last, foreach, etc...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the ideal scenario for using this feature?
I have an interesting nosqlbench use case that implies Linearized operations as stated on devdocs/linearized/linearized.md
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In the use case, we are using a clustering column which usually contains 20 values per partition key in a table . Algorithm is :
Partition-key based read on table A
Foreach (ck), Do a select in another table.
I can mitigate the problem for now, since I control data through a rampup phase, I can
reuse bindings for main phase.
I'm just thinking of how I could have done it without "knowing" table data.
I understood that "linearized" is design sketch only for now.
in inject syntax, it is stated :
The variable is assumed to be a single-valued type.
It's a logical limitation considering presented capture syntax.
I like the simplicity of the proposed syntax and don't think it should be changed.
I think this problem could be solved using, somehow, specific configs on statement or block that would both specify :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: