Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix catkin_lint #2120

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 29, 2020
Merged

Fix catkin_lint #2120

merged 3 commits into from
May 29, 2020

Conversation

JafarAbdi
Copy link
Member

Description

As you can see, right now the master branch is failing due to catkin_lint -- example: https://travis-ci.org/github/ros-planning/moveit/jobs/692499448

Checklist

  • Required by CI: Code is auto formatted using clang-format
  • Extend the tutorials / documentation reference
  • Document API changes relevant to the user in the MIGRATION.md notes
  • Create tests, which fail without this PR reference
  • Include a screenshot if changing a GUI
  • While waiting for someone to review your request, please help review another open pull request to support the maintainers

@JafarAbdi JafarAbdi requested a review from rhaschke as a code owner May 29, 2020 10:47
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 29, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2120 into master will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2120   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.80%   57.80%           
=======================================
  Files         328      328           
  Lines       25700    25700           
=======================================
+ Hits        14855    14856    +1     
+ Misses      10845    10844    -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ipulation/pick_place/src/manipulation_pipeline.cpp 76.41% <0.00%> (-0.95%) ⬇️
...raint_samplers/src/default_constraint_samplers.cpp 82.54% <0.00%> (-0.37%) ⬇️
moveit_core/robot_state/src/robot_state.cpp 47.98% <0.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
...dl_kinematics_plugin/src/kdl_kinematics_plugin.cpp 79.37% <0.00%> (+0.44%) ⬆️
...on/pick_place/src/approach_and_translate_stage.cpp 73.60% <0.00%> (+0.79%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update acc9450...235adf8. Read the comment docs.

@v4hn
Copy link
Contributor

v4hn commented May 29, 2020

@rhaschke argues for not having to add this dependency in cmake: #2116 (comment) .

@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ catkin_package(
moveit_ros_robot_interaction
object_recognition_msgs
roscpp
rviz
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one is correct, because we indeed include rviz headers in our headers.

moveit_setup_assistant/CMakeLists.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JafarAbdi JafarAbdi force-pushed the pr-fix_catkin_lint branch from 02612ff to 2bed7c3 Compare May 29, 2020 13:03
@JafarAbdi JafarAbdi requested a review from rhaschke May 29, 2020 13:50
Copy link
Contributor

@rhaschke rhaschke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good now. Thanks.

@rhaschke rhaschke merged commit 641fe84 into moveit:master May 29, 2020
rhaschke pushed a commit to ubi-agni/moveit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2020
catkin_lint became a little stricter in checking...
davetcoleman pushed a commit to davetcoleman/moveit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2020
catkin_lint became a little stricter in checking...
davetcoleman pushed a commit to davetcoleman/moveit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2020
catkin_lint became a little stricter in checking...
pradeepr-roboticist pushed a commit to pradeepr-roboticist/moveit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2020
catkin_lint became a little stricter in checking...
@tylerjw tylerjw mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2020
20 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants