Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

enhance: Separate load info cache from global meta one #37667

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

enhance: Separate load info cache from global meta one #37667

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

congqixia
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #37395

@congqixia
enhance: Separate load info cache from global meta one
93a086d 
Related to milvus-io#37395

Signed-off-by: Congqi Xia <congqi.xia@zilliz.com>
@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines. label Nov 14, 2024
@sre-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: congqixia

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mergify mergify bot added dco-passed DCO check passed. kind/enhancement Issues or changes related to enhancement labels Nov 14, 2024
@mergify Mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@congqixia cpp-unit-test check failed, comment rerun cpp-unit-test can trigger the job again.

@congqixia
Copy link
Contributor Author

rerun cpp-unit-test

@mergify Mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@congqixia go-sdk check failed, comment rerun go-sdk can trigger the job again.

@congqixia
Copy link
Contributor Author

rerun go-sdk

@mergify Mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@congqixia E2e jenkins job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.

@mergify Mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@congqixia go-sdk check failed, comment rerun go-sdk can trigger the job again.

@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.07%. Comparing base (31a8d08) to head (93a086d).
Report is 293 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #37667       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   82.49%   68.07%   -14.43%     
===========================================
  Files        1067      290      -777     
  Lines      165006    25457   -139549     
===========================================
- Hits       136126    17329   -118797     
+ Misses      23473     8128    -15345     
+ Partials     5407        0     -5407
Components Coverage Δ
Client ∅ <ø> (∅)
Core 68.07% <ø> (∅)
Go ∅ <ø> (∅)

see 1357 files with indirect coverage changes

@stale Stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 19, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen.

@stale stale bot added the stale indicates no udpates for 30 days label Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bigsheeper bigsheeper Awaiting requested review from bigsheeper

@czs007 czs007 Awaiting requested review from czs007

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved dco-passed DCO check passed. kind/enhancement Issues or changes related to enhancement size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines. stale indicates no udpates for 30 days
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@congqixia @sre-ci-robot