Move MFTF reference files from MFTF repo to devdocs [Do not Merge] #6560
Conversation
dobooth
added
Site Improvements
| This page lists all current action groups so developers can see what is available to them. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Action group list | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be nice to have here some explanation of what this list contains such as:
This list is grouped by a module. One module can have multiple XML files each of which contains one or more action groups. To learn more about action groups, refer to Action groups
The Action groups topics should contain a link to this reference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar for the Functional tests topic.
|
|
||
| #### [{{ file.filename }}]({{file.repo}}) | ||
|
|
||
| {% for test in file.actiongroups %} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
use actiongroup instead of test as a name of the object
| ## Action group list | ||
|
|
||
| {% assign actiongroups = site.data.codebase.mftf.action-groups | group_by: "module" | sort: "name" %} | ||
| {% for item in actiongroups %} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
use module instead of item as a name of the object
| {% assign actiongroups = site.data.codebase.mftf.action-groups | group_by: "module" | sort: "name" %} | ||
| {% for item in actiongroups %} | ||
|
|
||
| ### {{ item.name }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This makes the list to be a list of files, not the list of action groups.
Consider making this an action group name. The file name with a link to the source code would go then to metadata.
Add sorting for the action groups.
Consider the same for functional tests.
|
running tests |
|
Hi @dobooth, thank you for your contribution! |
Purpose of this pull request
This pull request (PR) moves two auto-generated reference topics from MFTF to devdocs reference section.
This simplifies dependencies between repos and it more consistent with devdocs guidelines.
Affected DevDocs pages