Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(deps): update Dockerfile to SPDK longhorn-v24.09 branch #710

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

fix(deps): update Dockerfile to SPDK longhorn-v24.09 branch #710

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

DamiaSan
Copy link
Contributor

Longhorn 9700

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Issue longhorn/longhorn#9700

What this PR does / why we need it:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation or context

@DamiaSan DamiaSan requested review from innobead, derekbit, c3y1huang, shuo-wu and a team November 15, 2024 15:32
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the Dockerfile used for building the SPDK component. The primary change involves updating the SPDK_COMMIT_ID environment variable to a new commit. The overall structure of the Dockerfile remains intact, with the build and installation logic for various components preserved. The verification step for dependencies and the entry point for the container also remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
package/Dockerfile Updated SPDK_COMMIT_ID from a6478cde7e0cff2fb09992868308a7387aa5202a to 10463b5c13b454e173707628b9eac608081f5082. Maintained build structure and verification steps.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update to upcoming 24.09 SPDK release (9700) ✅

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: update nvme-cli to v2.10.2 #701: The changes in this PR also involve updates to commit IDs in the Dockerfile, specifically for the NVME_CLI_COMMIT_ID, indicating a similar focus on managing dependencies within the Dockerfile structure.

Suggested reviewers

  • innobead
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f369f4f and 2cd1d60.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package/Dockerfile

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@DamiaSan DamiaSan mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Closed
@DamiaSan DamiaSan changed the title update to SPDK longhorn-v24.09 branch fix(deps): update Dockerfile to SPDK longhorn-v24.09 branch Nov 19, 2024
@DamiaSan
fix(deps): update Dockerfile to SPDK longhorn-v24.09 branch
2cd1d60 
Longhorn 9700

Signed-off-by: Damiano Cipriani <damiano.cipriani@suse.com>
@derekbit derekbit merged commit 56ebc33 into longhorn:master Nov 19, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@derekbit derekbit derekbit approved these changes

@innobead innobead Awaiting requested review from innobead

@c3y1huang c3y1huang Awaiting requested review from c3y1huang

@shuo-wu shuo-wu Awaiting requested review from shuo-wu

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@DamiaSan @derekbit