-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
enh: Fortran backend to visit Print
arguments
#5223
Conversation
I don't think this failure has anything to do with this PR, this is exact same error I get on [ 98%] Built target file_15_simplifier_FAST
[ 98%] Building Fortran object CMakeFiles/bits_04_simplifier_FAST.dir/bits_04.f90.o
[ 98%] Building Fortran object CMakeFiles/bits_02_simplifier_FAST.dir/bits_02.f90.o
[ 98%] Building Fortran object CMakeFiles/bits_05_simplifier_FAST.dir/bits_05.f90.o
[ 98%] Linking Fortran executable cos_01_simplifier_FAST
[ 98%] Linking Fortran executable sin_03_simplifier_FAST
[ 98%] Linking Fortran executable bits_01_simplifier_FAST
f951: Fatal Error: Cannot rename module file ‘lfortran_intrinsic_iso_fortran_env.mod0’ to ‘lfortran_intrinsic_iso_fortran_env.mod’: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
The command 'gfortran -fno-backtrace -o CMakeFiles/sin_04_simplifier_FAST.dir/sin_04.f90.o -c CMakeFiles/sin_04_simplifier_FAST.dir/sin_04.f90.o.tmp.f90' failed.
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/sin_04_simplifier_FAST.dir/build.make:75: CMakeFiles/sin_04_simplifier_FAST.dir/sin_04.f90.o] Error 11
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:9605: CMakeFiles/sin_04_simplifier_FAST.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[ 98%] Built target sin_01_simplifier_FAST
[ 98%] Linking Fortran executable bits_04_simplifier_FAST
[ 98%] Linking Fortran executable bits_02_simplifier_FAST
[ 99%] Linking Fortran executable bits_05_simplifier_FAST |
I opened #5227 for #5223 (comment) |
I don't see any failure in master? https://github.com/lfortran/lfortran/actions?query=branch%3Amain |
The failure comes when we run integration tests without -j1 |
I see. |
Fixes #5221