-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TAS: Assign only hostname values to TopologyAssignment #3677
TAS: Assign only hostname values to TopologyAssignment #3677
Conversation
/assign @mimowo |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First pass, but generally looking good
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just two nits
…stname label Update KEP and docs Fix tests, fix doc Update doc, commonize code Update e2e test
d1bfa46
to
989dd48
Compare
989dd48
to
39fc4de
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: fa7c8ee8ae03bd60fecff6543b4f41940f0965e5
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mimowo, PBundyra The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Proposal emphasizing the user-gain (optimized Workload size) , and that
|
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Assign only hostname values to TopologyAssignment is a user defines
kubernetes.io/hostname
in theTopology
objectWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3671
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?