-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[2.14] Backport: 6758, 6853 and 7003 to fix CRI-O pkg #7209
[2.14] Backport: 6758, 6853 and 7003 to fix CRI-O pkg #7209
Conversation
Hi @RickHaan. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I just noticed that this PR is incomplete. I need to backport and cherry-pick #6853 as well. Change status to WIP. |
I did a cherry-pick from #6758 as well since I especially needed the new apt repo task in Edit: I have cherry-picked to much, will start with a clean sheet and dive in deeper to keep original version specifications. Edit2: Although it looks like the main problem is fixed. I probably need to address 2 things (some advise would be welcome): |
cherry-pick modifications: * keep default to 1.17 as release 2.14 came with * don't change readme with newer versions * bump crio version to 1.19 * crio package name has changed for debian/ubuntu * crio upgrade does not work, see #6757 * update crio info in docs
and thereby support upgrade from e.g. 1.18.x to 1.19.y Included OSes: - Centos7/8 - Ubuntu18/20 New variables for overriding by default installed packages: - centos_crio_packages - ubuntu_crio_packages
* add support crio version for various k8s vers * regexp in pkg versions
/ok-to-test |
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, LuckySB, RickHaan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind failing-test
What this PR does / why we need it:
I am running into issues with the Kubespray CI with PR-7197.
I have created this PR to (cherry-pick) backport PR #6758, PR #6853 and PR #7003 into
release-2.14
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: