Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move VolumeBinding plugin args validation to apis/config/validation #99835

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2021
Merged

Move VolumeBinding plugin args validation to apis/config/validation #99835

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2021

Conversation

chendave
Copy link
Member

@chendave chendave commented Mar 5, 2021 •
edited
Loading

This PR also looses the check to allow zero since the API doc has explained that value zero indicates no waiting.

Value must be non-negative integer. The value zero indicates no waiting.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chen dave.chen@arm.com

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

`VolumeBindingArgs` now allow `BindTimeoutSeconds` to be set as zero, while the value zero indicates no waiting for the checking of volume binding operation.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@chendave: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Mar 5, 2021
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

chendave commented Mar 5, 2021

/sig scheduling

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. label Mar 5, 2021
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

chendave commented Mar 5, 2021

/cc @alculquicondor @ahg-g a easy one, could you PTAL?

@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

chendave commented Mar 5, 2021

irrelevant

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Mar 5, 2021
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

easy one

you never know 😉

Should we cherry pick? If so, please open a bug for tracking.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Mar 5, 2021
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

chendave commented Mar 5, 2021

Should we cherry pick? If so, please open a bug for tracking.

no idea, leaving it to you or @ahg-g for judging. :)

@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

chendave commented Mar 5, 2021

/retest

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

I guess I don't see why a user would want to set it to 0. Unless someone complains, we'll keep the fix just for the new release.

@chendave
Move VolumeBinding plugin args validation to apis/config/validation
b8394c4 
This PR also looses the check to allow zero since the API doc has
explained that value zero indicates no waiting.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chen <dave.chen@arm.com>
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

chendave commented Mar 6, 2021

I guess I don't see why a user would want to set it to 0. Unless someone complains, we'll keep the fix just for the new release.

+1, I also believe it is rare for a user to explicitly set it to 0.

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, chendave

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 027d9e6 into kubernetes:master Mar 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.21 milestone Mar 8, 2021
@chendave chendave deleted the args branch March 9, 2021 01:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@alculquicondor alculquicondor alculquicondor left review comments

@ahg-g ahg-g Awaiting requested review from ahg-g

@saikat-royc saikat-royc Awaiting requested review from saikat-royc

Assignees

@alculquicondor alculquicondor

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.21
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@chendave @k8s-ci-robot @alculquicondor