-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make all health checks probing consistent #98376
Conversation
/cc @SergeyKanzhelev |
2072236
to
56c4ced
Compare
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-ubuntu-containerd |
/assign @timothysc |
labels cleanup: /kind bug Are you sure you don't want to add a release note? May be handy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
I took getting some sleep seriously 🙃
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, matthyx, mrunalp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This may deserve a release note given it will impact (in a positive way) how probes work |
Is it possible to add one in the description after merge, or it won't work and I need to do it differently? |
i have no clue
…On Sun, Mar 7, 2021, 11:18 AM Matthias Bertschy ***@***.***> wrote:
This may deserve a release note given it will impact (in a positive way)
how probes work
Is it possible to add one in the description after merge, or it won't work
and I need to do it differently?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#98376 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEYGXN473T3CTXXLZW2S4LTCPGQJANCNFSM4WSC7YHA>
.
|
You might need to make a PR to k/sig-release release note draft https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/tree/master/releases/release-1.21/release-notes, but I would double-check with @wilsonehusin, 1.21 Release notes lead. @wilsonehusin, Could you help answer if the description change after merge would work? |
you can modify this PR body anytime before we start collecting. we will be gathering the next batch on Tuesday / whenever |
Thanks @wilsonehusin I have added something, please let me know if that's clear enough. |
Maybe more text like this:
|
I usually use the heuristic of "giving reader a good-enough idea of what happened without opening the PR". From glancing through the issues mentioned, do you think the following would be accurate to describe the changes?
|
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Current handling of readiness/startupProbe result updates don't include an immediate sync after declaring the container as failed.
Thus, the sync is done via slower async methods.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #96731
Fixes #98007
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: