Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document how a secrets server like Vault or Keywhiz might fit into Kubernetes #9098

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2015

Conversation

benmccann
Copy link

No description provided.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 2, 2015

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? (reply "ok to test", or if you trust the user, reply "add to whitelist")

If this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 10, 2015

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? (reply "ok to test", or if you trust the user, reply "add to whitelist")

If this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@pmorie pmorie added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 17, 2015
@pmorie
Copy link
Member

pmorie commented Jun 17, 2015

@benmccann Thanks for the PR; apologies for review latency

saad-ali added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2015
Document how a secrets server like Vault or Keywhiz might fit into Kubernetes
@saad-ali saad-ali merged commit 968156e into kubernetes:master Jun 18, 2015
xingzhou pushed a commit to xingzhou/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2016
Document how a secrets server like Vault or Keywhiz might fit into Kubernetes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants