Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix kube-proxy PodSecurityPolicy RoleBinding namespace #72761

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2019
Merged

Fix kube-proxy PodSecurityPolicy RoleBinding namespace #72761

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2019

Conversation

tallclair
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
kube-proxy's PodSecurityPolicy binding was accidentally created in the default namespace rather than kube-system

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Fix kube-proxy PodSecurityPolicy binding on GCE & GKE. This was only an issue when running kube-proxy as a DaemonSet, with PodSecurityPolicy enabled.

/sig gce
/priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 10, 2019
@tallclair
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @cadmuxe

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tallclair: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: cadmuxe.

Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can be assigned and that issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

/assign @cadmuxe

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tallclair
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @bowei

@krmayankk
Copy link

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 10, 2019
@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented Jan 10, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bowei, tallclair

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 10, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

1 similar comment
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@tallclair
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@tallclair
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 06af89c into kubernetes:master Jan 11, 2019
This was referenced Jan 11, 2019
Closed
Merged
Merged
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request #72834 from tallclair/automated-cherry-pick-of-#72…
c6e60c0 
…761-upstream-release-1.11

Automated cherry pick of #72761 upstream release 1.11
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request #72835 from tallclair/automated-cherry-pick-of-#72…
7045062 
…761-upstream-release-1.12

Automated cherry pick of #72761 upstream release 1.12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gmarek gmarek Awaiting requested review from gmarek

@jszczepkowski jszczepkowski Awaiting requested review from jszczepkowski

Assignees

@bowei bowei

@krmayankk krmayankk

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@tallclair @k8s-ci-robot @krmayankk @bowei @fejta-bot