Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validating against negative weights for priority functions #6375

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2015

Conversation

abhgupta
Copy link

@abhgupta abhgupta commented Apr 2, 2015

Refer discussion on another PR for some context for this change.
#6202 (comment)

@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request.

It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project, in which case you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) at https://cla.developers.google.com/.

If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check the information on your CLA or see this help article on setting the email on your git commits.

Once you've done that, please reply here to let us know. If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name.

@abhgupta
Copy link
Author

abhgupta commented Apr 2, 2015

/cc @lavalamp

@lavalamp lavalamp self-assigned this Apr 2, 2015
@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

lavalamp commented Apr 2, 2015

LGTM. I think this is reasonable considering what is done with the weights & priority functions.

@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

lavalamp commented Apr 2, 2015

Travis is a known flake. Merging.

lavalamp added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2015
Validating against negative weights for priority functions
@lavalamp lavalamp merged commit 4a3b1a2 into kubernetes:master Apr 2, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants