Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorder/Modularize networking e2e + pod launch phase, clean up comments. #6341

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2015

Conversation

jayunit100
Copy link
Member

Creating a new PR, the other seemed to die on me.

@jayunit100
Copy link
Member Author

fixing collision now with refactored Provider function.

@jayunit100 jayunit100 force-pushed the networking-test-reorder branch from e76a41d to bab2788 Compare April 2, 2015 02:40
@jayunit100
Copy link
Member Author

ok @satnam6502 and @bgrant0607 .... finally here is theupdated pr. i killed the old one as it got broken by a conflicted commits + a messed up rebase on my end. this is the updated pr. Thanks !

@satnam6502
Copy link
Contributor

Re-assigning for a quicker review :-)

@satnam6502
Copy link
Contributor

@piosz feel free to bounce this back to me and I shall try to get to it on Thursday.

})

func LaunchNetTestPodPerNode(nodes *api.NodeList, name string, c *client.Client, ns string) []string {

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a By statement here. Also remove this empty line.

@jayunit100
Copy link
Member Author

Okay, i implemented the fixes and comments inline. Regarding "peers" its not x-1, its x. The reason is that the service endpoints array actually returns all endpoints, so each node is a peer of itself, by definition.

i will test this later

e2e's are not run in the CI, so we should be careful before we merge it ! :)

@jayunit100
Copy link
Member Author

yup, tests pass :) rebasing and pushing. thanks for the fast review.

@jayunit100 jayunit100 force-pushed the networking-test-reorder branch from a026240 to 3ad7557 Compare April 2, 2015 15:35
@satnam6502
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, thanks to @piosz for letting us exploit a time zone difference to our advantage :-)

@piosz
Copy link
Member

piosz commented Apr 2, 2015

LGTM. Thanks for the change. @satnam6502 could you please do merge since I won't be online anymore?

@piosz piosz added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 2, 2015
satnam6502 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2015
Reorder/Modularize networking e2e + pod launch phase, clean up comments.
@satnam6502 satnam6502 merged commit d0dcc37 into kubernetes:master Apr 2, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/test-infra lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants