Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create StorageClass for each volume binding test case #62230

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2018

Conversation

msau42
Copy link
Member

@msau42 msau42 commented Apr 7, 2018

What this PR does / why we need it:
Use a different StorageClass for each test case so that subsequent test cases don't accidentally bind to PVs created in previous test cases. The alternative solution of waiting for all the resources to be fully deleted added a significant amount of time to the test, so I prefer using this storage class approach.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #62205

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 7, 2018
@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Apr 7, 2018

cc @resouer

@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Apr 7, 2018

/assign @verult

@verult
Copy link
Contributor

verult commented Apr 9, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 9, 2018
@msau42 msau42 force-pushed the redo-integration branch from 91c66c4 to 12fd0a8 Compare April 10, 2018 00:18
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 10, 2018
@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Apr 10, 2018

/assign @bsalamat
for approval

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 10, 2018
@verult
Copy link
Contributor

verult commented Apr 10, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 10, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bsalamat, msau42, verult

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@msau42
Copy link
Member Author

msau42 commented Apr 10, 2018

/retest

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 61549, 62230, 62055, 61082, 62212). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 622789d into kubernetes:master Apr 11, 2018
@msau42 msau42 deleted the redo-integration branch November 17, 2018 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Volume binding integration test can be flaky
5 participants