Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make replication controller synchronizations independent. #618

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2014

Conversation

brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Unsafe mock?

}
wait.Done()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You mean wait.Wait() here.

YMMV, but I prefer the name "wg" for waitgroups.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done and done.

@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

Not unsafe mock, unsafe code ;)

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed.

(this is the biggest gotcha of go routing programming as far as I can tell. I'm way to used to better scope binding than this. If they can do it correctly in Scheme, why can't they do it correctly in go?)

@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

LGTM. This is gonna really pound apiserver periodically... may eventually want to spread out the syncing a little... Actually, nvm, when I get watch working reliably there'll be no need for this periodic sync.

lavalamp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2014
Make replication controller synchronizations independent.
@lavalamp lavalamp merged commit e3927b4 into kubernetes:master Jul 25, 2014
@brendandburns brendandburns deleted the async branch August 7, 2015 04:43
vishh pushed a commit to vishh/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2016
mqliang pushed a commit to mqliang/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
…-aliyun-cloud-provider

rebase aliyun cloud provider to 1.3.3
mqliang pushed a commit to mqliang/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2017
…-aliyun-cloud-provider

rebase aliyun cloud provider to 1.3.3
wking pushed a commit to wking/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2020
b3atlesfan pushed a commit to b3atlesfan/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
…ed_master

Tolerate flannel running on master nodes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants