-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support multiple scale sets in Azure cloud provider #57543
Conversation
@karataliu for review |
if err := ss.updateCache(); err != nil { | ||
glog.Errorf("updateCache failed: %v", err) | ||
} | ||
}, 5*time.Minute, wait.NeverStop) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there any reference for this value?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No.
return "", cloudprovider.InstanceNotFound | ||
scaleSetName, err := extractScaleSetNameByVMID(providerID) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
glog.V(4).Infof("Can not extract scale set name from providerID (%s), assuming it is mananaged by availability set", providerID) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Infof ? Pls print err, and it does not return err?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed.
|
||
instanceID, err := getLastSegment(providerID) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
glog.V(4).Infof("Can not extract instanceID from providerID (%s), assuming it is mananaged by availability set", providerID) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same as above about err
BTW, will there be a similar implementaion of updatecache for availability set? |
availability set cache will be supported with difference ways. @karataliu is working on it. |
/retest |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx, feiskyer Associated issue: #43287 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
You can indicate your approval by writing |
/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge] |
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 57502, 57543). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here. |
@feiskyer: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds multiple scale sets support in Azure cloud provider.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Continue of #43287.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note:
/assign @brendandburns @andyzhangx