Add Docker caching support to CoreOS' clusters. #5254
Conversation
AntonioMeireles
commented
Mar 10, 2015
AntonioMeireles
commented
|
@brendandburns : Are you the right person to assign this to? |
|
fyi @pires |
|
guys, i've appended an extra patchlet to simplify fleet's instrumentation. IMHO, it also would make sense to handle flannels' invocation in a similar way (taking advantage of what already ships nativelly) and just consume the (units in) currently shipping CoreOS. So, is there any good reason to be using the blob at https://storage.googleapis.com/k8s/flanneld instead of the upstream bits shipping in plain CoreOS ? (fwiw in the kubernetes-vagrant-coreos-cluster project we've been using plain upstream flannel without any (obvious) issues ). |
AntonioMeireles
force-pushed
the
add_docker_caching_to_CoreOS_cluster
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2a515d7 to
67ee10d
Compare
a more idiomatic take on kubernetes#4378. as a bonus, and to be nice on resources, an ultra lightweight docker-registry container is consumed. Signed-off-by: António Meireles <antonio.meireles@reformi.st>
Signed-off-by: António Meireles <antonio.meireles@reformi.st>
AntonioMeireles
force-pushed
the
add_docker_caching_to_CoreOS_cluster
branch
from
67ee10d to
b5a50ca
Compare
|
Looks good to me. merging. (the reason we use the blob in google storage is idempotentcy of deploy, but given that we haven't updated it in a while, I'm ok with relying on the CoreOS version) |
…oreOS_cluster Add Docker caching support to CoreOS' clusters.
in the footsteps of kubernetes#5254 merge earlier today and per @brendandburns comments in the PR review thread... Signed-off-by: António Meireles <antonio.meireles@reformi.st>
in the footsteps of kubernetes#5254 merge earlier today and per @brendandburns comments in the PR review thread... Signed-off-by: António Meireles <antonio.meireles@reformi.st>
