-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix typo in ExecCommandParam #45440
Fix typo in ExecCommandParam #45440
Conversation
Hi @verb. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Seems not fixed in all places. You could search ExecCommandParamm across the project, and see where it is used. |
@feiskyer whoops, I didn't quite understand the role of the staging directory. I've updated the commit to include every "ExecCommandParamm" included by git grep in the kubernetes repo. Let me know if there are other repos to check. |
@k8s-bot ok to test |
Now that I think about it, I guess "ExecCommandParamm" was released as part of the versioned API. Does that mean we have to keep the typo around indefinitely? If so I'll fix the typo internally and leave an extra "ExecCommandParamm" constant in types.go |
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
/approve no-issue |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, verb Assign the PR to them by writing Associated issue requirement bypassed by: deads2k The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
You can indicate your approval by writing |
fixing a typo in the code (not the exposed value). approving |
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49017, 45440, 48384, 45894, 48808) |
What this PR does / why we need it: Makes ExecCommandParam look like all of the other "Param"s
Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close that issue when PR gets merged):Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: