Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use federated namespace instead of the bootstrap cluster's namespace in Ingress e2e tests. #32105

Merged

Conversation

madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor

@madhusudancs madhusudancs commented Sep 6, 2016

This should fix #31825.

cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-federation @quinton-hoole


This change is Reviewable

@madhusudancs madhusudancs added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. area/cluster-federation labels Sep 6, 2016
@madhusudancs madhusudancs added this to the v1.4 milestone Sep 6, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 6, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Sep 6, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit b789e22.

@nikhiljindal
Copy link
Contributor

I remember fixing this test in my admission control PR (#31139)

Looks like #29773 is the culprit PR?

@@ -94,24 +93,24 @@ var _ = framework.KubeDescribe("Federated ingresses [Feature:Federation]", func(
jig = newFederationTestJig(f.FederationClientset_1_4)
clusters = map[string]*cluster{}
primaryClusterName = registerClusters(clusters, UserAgentName, federationName, f)
ns = f.Namespace.Name
ns = f.FederationNamespace.Name
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: At other places in this test, we use nsName. Should be consistent.

@nikhiljindal
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, thanks!

@nikhiljindal nikhiljindal added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 6, 2016
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Sep 7, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit b789e22.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 93f7cbd into kubernetes:master Sep 7, 2016
@pwittrock pwittrock added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Sep 10, 2016
pwittrock pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2016
@k8s-cherrypick-bot
Copy link

Commit found in the "release-1.4" branch appears to be this PR. Removing the "cherrypick-candidate" label. If this is an error find help to get your PR picked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
7 participants