Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove duplicated nginx image. Use nginx-slim instead #27468

Merged

Conversation

aledbf
Copy link
Member

@aledbf aledbf commented Jun 15, 2016

This PR removes the image gcr.io/google_containers/nginx:1.7.9 and uses gcr.io/google_containers/nginx-slim:0.7.
Besides removing the duplication 1.7.9 is 16 months old.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 15, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

3 similar comments
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 15, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 15, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 15, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@aledbf
Copy link
Member Author

aledbf commented Jun 15, 2016

ping @bprashanth

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note-label-needed labels Jun 15, 2016
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ spec:
command:
- /bin/sh
- -c
- "for i in gcr.io/google_containers/busybox gcr.io/google_containers/busybox:1.24 gcr.io/google_containers/dnsutils:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/eptest:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/fakegitserver:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/hostexec:1.2 gcr.io/google_containers/iperf:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/jessie-dnsutils:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/liveness:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/mounttest:0.2 gcr.io/google_containers/mounttest:0.5 gcr.io/google_containers/mounttest:0.6 gcr.io/google_containers/mounttest-user:0.3 gcr.io/google_containers/netexec:1.4 gcr.io/google_containers/netexec:1.5 gcr.io/google_containers/nettest:1.7 gcr.io/google_containers/nettest:1.8 gcr.io/google_containers/nginx:1.7.9 gcr.io/google_containers/nginx-slim:0.5 gcr.io/google_containers/n-way-http:1.0 gcr.io/google_containers/pause:2.0 gcr.io/google_containers/pause-amd64:3.0 gcr.io/google_containers/porter:cd5cb5791ebaa8641955f0e8c2a9bed669b1eaab gcr.io/google_containers/portforwardtester:1.0 gcr.io/google_containers/redis:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/resource_consumer:beta2 gcr.io/google_containers/serve_hostname:v1.4 gcr.io/google_containers/servicelb:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/test-webserver:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/ubuntu:14.04 gcr.io/google_containers/update-demo:kitten gcr.io/google_containers/update-demo:nautilus gcr.io/google_containers/volume-ceph:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/volume-gluster:0.2 gcr.io/google_containers/volume-iscsi:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/volume-nfs:0.6 gcr.io/google_containers/volume-rbd:0.1 gcr.io/google_samples/gb-redisslave:v1; do echo $(date '+%X') pulling $i; docker pull $i 1>/dev/null; done; exit 0;"
- "for i in gcr.io/google_containers/busybox gcr.io/google_containers/busybox:1.24 gcr.io/google_containers/dnsutils:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/eptest:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/fakegitserver:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/hostexec:1.2 gcr.io/google_containers/iperf:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/jessie-dnsutils:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/liveness:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/mounttest:0.2 gcr.io/google_containers/mounttest:0.5 gcr.io/google_containers/mounttest:0.6 gcr.io/google_containers/mounttest-user:0.3 gcr.io/google_containers/netexec:1.4 gcr.io/google_containers/netexec:1.5 gcr.io/google_containers/nettest:1.7 gcr.io/google_containers/nettest:1.8 gcr.io/google_containers/nginx-slim:0.7 gcr.io/google_containers/n-way-http:1.0 gcr.io/google_containers/pause:2.0 gcr.io/google_containers/pause-amd64:3.0 gcr.io/google_containers/porter:cd5cb5791ebaa8641955f0e8c2a9bed669b1eaab gcr.io/google_containers/portforwardtester:1.0 gcr.io/google_containers/redis:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/resource_consumer:beta2 gcr.io/google_containers/serve_hostname:v1.4 gcr.io/google_containers/servicelb:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/test-webserver:e2e gcr.io/google_containers/ubuntu:14.04 gcr.io/google_containers/update-demo:kitten gcr.io/google_containers/update-demo:nautilus gcr.io/google_containers/volume-ceph:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/volume-gluster:0.2 gcr.io/google_containers/volume-iscsi:0.1 gcr.io/google_containers/volume-nfs:0.6 gcr.io/google_containers/volume-rbd:0.1 gcr.io/google_samples/gb-redisslave:v1; do echo $(date '+%X') pulling $i; docker pull $i 1>/dev/null; done; exit 0;"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you also remove servicelb from this list? we don't run that e2e in a blocking suite so it's not worth pulling

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@bprashanth
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the cleanup!

@bprashanth bprashanth added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 15, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 15, 2016
@aledbf aledbf force-pushed the remove-duplicated-nginx-image branch from 060aaf3 to 9271192 Compare June 15, 2016 20:25
@bprashanth bprashanth added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed release-note-label-needed labels Jun 15, 2016
@aledbf aledbf force-pushed the remove-duplicated-nginx-image branch from 9271192 to 169af60 Compare June 16, 2016 02:28
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2016
@aledbf
Copy link
Member Author

aledbf commented Jun 16, 2016

ping @bprashanth

@bprashanth bprashanth added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 16, 2016
@aledbf aledbf force-pushed the remove-duplicated-nginx-image branch from 169af60 to c5cabcc Compare June 16, 2016 11:06
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jun 16, 2016
@bprashanth
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot test this github issue: #27551

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 16, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit c5cabccb208dffa9b5fe0fbd1d83044a364bfd7c.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 23, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 24, 2016
@aledbf aledbf force-pushed the remove-duplicated-nginx-image branch from c5cabcc to f4ee227 Compare June 24, 2016 21:14
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 24, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 24, 2016

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit f4ee227ccacd33657d2cc157973d4d02a7e48e5c.

Please reference the list of currently known flakes when examining this failure. If you request a re-test, you must reference the issue describing the flake.

@bprashanth
Copy link
Contributor

bprashanth commented Jun 25, 2016

@k8s-bot test this github issue: #27551

@bprashanth bprashanth added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 25, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 25, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit f4ee227ccacd33657d2cc157973d4d02a7e48e5c.

@aledbf aledbf force-pushed the remove-duplicated-nginx-image branch from f4ee227 to ec5cc59 Compare June 28, 2016 21:35
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 28, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 28, 2016

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit ec5cc59.

Please reference the list of currently known flakes when examining this failure. If you request a re-test, you must reference the issue describing the flake.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 29, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 29, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit ec5cc59.

@bprashanth bprashanth added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 29, 2016
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 29, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit ec5cc59.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 594e4d8 into kubernetes:master Jun 29, 2016
@aledbf aledbf deleted the remove-duplicated-nginx-image branch July 15, 2016 15:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants