Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

only handled non host network pods for hostports in kubenet #27141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2016

Conversation

freehan
Copy link
Contributor

@freehan freehan commented Jun 9, 2016

attempt to fix: #27118

@freehan freehan added priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Jun 9, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 9, 2016
@yujuhong yujuhong added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 9, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 1b2386f.

@yujuhong yujuhong added this to the v1.3 milestone Jun 9, 2016
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 10, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 1b2386f.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 805a0aa into kubernetes:master Jun 10, 2016
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Revert "Revert "GCI: add support for network plugin""

PR #27027 added the network plugin support in GCI config, but later a bug in the network plugin broke e2e tests (see issue #27118). The bug was fixed by #27141 and we have been repeatedly run the serial e2e tests more than 10 times to verify the fix. Now it should be safe to put the GCI network plugin support back.

We will first merge in the master branch and monitor the Jenkins serial tests for a while and then cherry-pick it into release-1.3 branch.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

kubernetes-e2e-gce-serial: broken test run
5 participants