Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

remove DCOS section from README.md #26716

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2016
Merged

remove DCOS section from README.md #26716

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2016

Conversation

justinclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Analytics

As far as I can tell, as of DCOS 1.7, the Kubernetes-Mesos framework is no longer available in the DCOS Universe. This PR reflects that change so as not to cause confusion.

@justinclayton
remove DCOS section from README.md
b6130ca 
As far as I can tell, as of DCOS 1.7, the Kubernetes-Mesos framework is no longer available in the DCOS Universe. This PR reflects that change so as not to cause confusion.
@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.

  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 2, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

2 similar comments
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 2, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 2, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note-label-needed labels Jun 2, 2016
@justinclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

I signed it.

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

@googlebot googlebot added cla: yes and removed cla: no labels Jun 2, 2016
@karlkfi karlkfi removed their assignment Jun 2, 2016
@jdef jdef self-assigned this Jun 2, 2016
@jdef jdef added kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. e2e-not-required labels Jun 2, 2016
@jdef
Copy link
Contributor

jdef commented Jun 2, 2016

LGTM

@jdef
Copy link
Contributor

jdef commented Jun 2, 2016

@k8s-bot ok to test

@jdef jdef added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 2, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 2, 2016
@karlkfi karlkfi added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed release-note-label-needed labels Jun 2, 2016
@jdef
Copy link
Contributor

jdef commented Jun 11, 2016

@k8s-bot test this issue #IGNORE

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 14, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

1 similar comment
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 15, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@jdef
Copy link
Contributor

jdef commented Jun 15, 2016

@k8s-bot ok to test

@jdef
Copy link
Contributor

jdef commented Jun 15, 2016

@k8s-bot test this issue #IGNORE

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 23, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit b6130ca.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 23, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in kubernetes/test-infra/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit a9678fa into kubernetes:master Jun 24, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@jdef jdef

Labels
area/platform/mesos kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@justinclayton @googlebot @k8s-bot @jdef @k8s-github-robot @karlkfi