Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add CoreKube to community resources #23719

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2016

Conversation

metral
Copy link
Contributor

@metral metral commented Apr 1, 2016

No description provided.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Apr 1, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in hack/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull/ instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

2 similar comments
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Apr 1, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in hack/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull/ instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Apr 1, 2016

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? If so, please reply "ok to test".
(Note: "add to whitelist" is no longer supported. Please update configurations in hack/jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull/ instead.)

This message may repeat a few times in short succession due to jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin#292. Sorry.

Otherwise, if this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Labelling this PR as size/XS

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note-label-needed labels Apr 1, 2016
@eparis
Copy link
Contributor

eparis commented Apr 1, 2016

@sarahnovotny

@sarahnovotny sarahnovotny added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2016
@sarahnovotny
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM'd

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot ok to test
@k8s-bot test this

pr builder appears to be missing, activating due to 'lgtm' label.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Removing LGTM because the release note process has not been followed.
One of the following labels is required "release-note", "release-note-none", or "release-note-action-required"
Please see: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/proposals/release-notes.md

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2016
@sarahnovotny sarahnovotny added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-merge release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed release-note-label-needed labels Apr 1, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Apr 1, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 022c39e.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 3307809 into kubernetes:master Apr 2, 2016
@metral metral deleted the corekube branch April 6, 2016 18:30
openshift-publish-robot pushed a commit to openshift/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2019
Bug 1748150: Modify scheduler preemption tests (fixup kubernetes#23645)

Origin-commit: ab0a4e4a36c80e1a680c87913edaaeaa5423a9b4
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants