Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

run kube-addon-manager in a static pod #23600

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2016

Conversation

mikedanese
Copy link
Member

Depends on #23605 and #24108

Ref #23233

@mikedanese mikedanese self-assigned this Mar 29, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 29, 2016
@mikedanese mikedanese force-pushed the addon-manager branch 3 times, most recently from 4d443f4 to 6dda05e Compare March 29, 2016 21:23
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note-label-needed labels Mar 30, 2016
@mikedanese mikedanese closed this Apr 11, 2016
@mikedanese mikedanese reopened this Apr 11, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 11, 2016
@mikedanese mikedanese force-pushed the addon-manager branch 4 times, most recently from 1f1d97f to 0eeb6b1 Compare April 11, 2016 20:01
@mikedanese mikedanese removed their assignment Apr 11, 2016
@mikedanese mikedanese added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed release-note-label-needed labels Apr 11, 2016
@mikedanese mikedanese changed the title run kube-addon-manager in a pod run kube-addon-manager in a static pod Apr 11, 2016
@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented May 6, 2016

I don't think we need to do those changes here.

I may send a PR for cross-building this image

@roberthbailey roberthbailey added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 6, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented May 8, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 3e1c0b5.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented May 8, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 3e1c0b5.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit f46f35a into kubernetes:master May 8, 2016
@mikedanese mikedanese deleted the addon-manager branch May 8, 2016 19:06
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2016
Automatic merge from submit-queue

GCI/Trusty: Fix the running of kube-addon-manager

This PR fixes the issue that kube-addon-master (added in #23600) is not started. Without this fix, no kube-system pods can be running correctly. As a result, the GCI-based Jenkins testing k8s head has been down for a couple of days. The root cause is that we stopped to use namespace.yaml, but configure-helper.sh still tries to copy it. This PR also gets rid of /var/cache/kubernetes-install/kube_env.yaml, as it is not needed anymore after #24108.

@mikedanese @roberthbailey @dchen1107 please review it. If possible please mark it as P1, as it blocks GCI-based Jenkins tests.

cc/ @kubernetes/goog-image @fabioy FYI
@danehans
Copy link

@mikedanese it looks like this commit broke addons support in contrib/ansible kubernetes-retired/contrib#1004

euank added a commit to euank/kubernetes that referenced this pull request May 24, 2016
After kubernetes#23600 our previous kube-up was broken. This fixes it.
euank added a commit to coreos/kubernetes that referenced this pull request May 25, 2016
After kubernetes#23600 our previous kube-up was broken. This fixes it.
openshift-publish-robot pushed a commit to openshift/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2019
…nt-manager-tests

Bug 1733581: Failing tests NoExecuteTaintManager Multiple Pods evicts pods

Origin-commit: 2d1df54a8e1cded7ada239b2029655d4aa9155f2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants