Cross-build hyperkube and debian-iptables for ARM. Also add a flannel image #21617
Conversation
|
Labelling this PR as size/L |
k8s-github-robot
added
the
size/L
|
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 2d6c0ecf86c035d9f71a540d775d643049e9173b. |
|
The author of this PR is not in the whitelist for merge, can one of the admins add the 'ok-to-merge' label? |
luxas
force-pushed
the
hyperkube_for_arm
branch
from
9cef39e to
3df5c7b
Compare
|
Labelling this PR as size/M |
k8s-github-robot
added
size/M
|
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 9cef39ea0fe95741c96dd7e55db462ac14730168. |
|
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 3df5c7b471eb288ca31a8e3ee745f34cd5e3529f. |
|
Labelling this PR as size/L |
k8s-github-robot
added
size/L
|
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit f83aee048d191c6c26926a545cbaaa2bea97cca4. |
|
Not sure who's best equipped, but assigning to @david-mcmahon. @thockin might be good too. Very sorry for the delay, 1.2 was consuming all of my time and I'm just now going through my stack of PRs. |
|
@lavalamp Ok, what's your opinion about this? It's using Before this may be merged, some of you should push the It would be great to start with this, then I may create a follow-up PR that updates references to the images and so on. |
|
Unfortunately, I've never tried doing an arm cross-build, so I don't really have an opinion on this. But if you say it works I'll believe you :) |
|
As I don't plan on looking at this in the next couple of weeks at least, removing myself. @luxas feel free to take this and run with it. |
|
@david-mcmahon What do you mean? |
|
@luxas did you want to work on this? |
|
@k8s-bot test this please github issue: #IGNORE |
|
Thanks a lot @david-mcmahon! |
|
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit fab9ca549e89ba0d6fe5091b3bf8e443c600bc6b. |
david-mcmahon
added
lgtm
|
LGTM pending passing of tests. |
…r arm, arm64 and ppc64le. Build and push hyperkube for arm on every release
|
Will update. Ran |
|
PR changed after LGTM, removing LGTM. |
k8s-github-robot
removed
the
lgtm
david-mcmahon
added
the
lgtm
|
Yay! Was able to get k8s up and running by following the official |
|
@luxas Thanks for taking the time to explain the need for bootstrapping the images. |
|
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 560268e. |
|
The author of this PR is not in the whitelist for merge, can one of the admins add the 'ok-to-merge' label? |
|
@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge] |
|
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 560268e. |
|
@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge] |
|
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 560268e. |
|
Automatic merge from submit-queue |
We have to be able to build complex docker images too on
amd64hosts.Right now we can't build Dockerfiles with
RUNcommands when building for other architectures e.g. ARM.Resin has a tutorial about this here: https://resin.io/blog/building-arm-containers-on-any-x86-machine-even-dockerhub/
But it's a bit clumsy syntax.
The other alternative would be running this command in a Makefile:
and
Then the kernel will be able to differ ARM binaries from amd64. When it finds a ARM binary, it will invoke
/usr/bin/qemu-arm-staticfirst and letsqemutranslate the ARM syscalls to amd64 ones.Some code here: https://github.com/multiarch
WDYT is the best approach? If registering
binfmt_miscin the kernels of the machines is OK, then I think we should go with that.Otherwise, we'll have to wait for resin's patch to be merged into mainline qemu before we may use the code I have here now.
@fgrzadkowski @david-mcmahon @brendandburns @zmerlynn @ixdy @ihmccreery @thockin