-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to selector generation design #21192
Conversation
We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request) and all commit authors, but as best as we can tell these commits were authored by someone else. If that's the case, please add them to this pull request and have them confirm that they're okay with these commits being contributed to Google. If we're mistaken and you did author these commits, just reply here to confirm. |
68ae4fb
to
b258cbc
Compare
CLAs look good, thanks! |
@bgrant0607 you okayed this name change in a chat. |
Labelling this PR as size/M |
Also improve doc slightly.
Avoids double negative.
b258cbc
to
2b9d22e
Compare
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit b258cbc4bafa62e336a3ffc8cc39c368e83d10c3. |
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 2b9d22e. |
LGTM |
Automatic merge from submit-queue |
Auto commit by PR queue bot
Move from proposals to design because it is going to happen.
Renamed from "noAutoSelector" to "manualSelector" to avoid a double negative.
Defaulting and meaning is the same.