Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Scheduler and ControllerManager profile grabbing #18514

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2015

Conversation

gmarek
Copy link
Contributor

@gmarek gmarek commented Dec 10, 2015

Requires #18338 to work on e2e clusters.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Labelling this PR as size/M

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 10, 2015
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 10, 2015

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit a819367.

@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@wojtek-t wojtek-t added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. e2e-not-required labels Dec 11, 2015
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2015
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit db08e06 into kubernetes:master Dec 11, 2015
@gmarek gmarek deleted the grab-profiles branch March 17, 2016 14:52
openshift-publish-robot pushed a commit to openshift/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2018
…watch-multiple-reqs

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

UPSTREAM: 59506: fix watch on multiple reqs

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537789

`oc get <resource> --watch` only supports watching a single resource kind at a time.
This check fails if more than one resource `Info` is returned.

When dealing with large quantities of a single resource kind, or an amount that exceeds the value of `--chunk-size`, more than one request is made to the server causing a resource `Info` to be created for each of the requests, ultimately causing the above check to fail even though we are dealing with the same type of resource.

This patch modifies that check to take into account the GVKs of all infos returned, and only fail if at least one differs.

cc @deads2k @jeremyeder

Origin-commit: 48d2a6d1900fb16a35fb7ff47d3750f8021b9ef3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants