Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deprecate confusing flag usage for --bind-address for api-server #18128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2015

Conversation

dalanlan
Copy link
Contributor

@dalanlan dalanlan commented Dec 3, 2015

Fix #18049

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Labelling this PR as size/XS

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 3, 2015
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 3, 2015

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit e2cf9c87021509e7d8d420a18d8cbb2590982dcb.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 3, 2015

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 87f901d12aedbe5764d09681d1834af2c14a2a71.

@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ func (s *APIServer) AddFlags(fs *pflag.FlagSet) {
fs.IPVar(&s.InsecureBindAddress, "address", s.InsecureBindAddress, "DEPRECATED: see --insecure-bind-address instead")
fs.MarkDeprecated("address", "see --insecure-bind-address instead")
fs.IPVar(&s.BindAddress, "bind-address", s.BindAddress, ""+
"The IP address on which to serve the --read-only-port and --secure-port ports. The "+
"The IP address on which to serve the --secure-port ports. The "+
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/ports/port/

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, is "The IP address on which to listen for the --secure-port." more readable?

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 4, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 387d861.

@dalanlan
Copy link
Contributor Author

dalanlan commented Dec 5, 2015

@lavalamp Comment addressed.
Might need to kick off jenkins for another run. (e2e not quite required though.)

@lavalamp lavalamp added e2e-not-required lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Dec 7, 2015
@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

lavalamp commented Dec 7, 2015

lgtm

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2015
Auto commit by PR queue bot
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 94752c1 into kubernetes:master Dec 7, 2015
@dalanlan dalanlan deleted the fix-typo branch December 8, 2015 01:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants