Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ubuntu: skip binaries downloading if specified version exists #18002

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2015
Merged

Conversation

wiwiwa
Copy link

@wiwiwa wiwiwa commented Dec 1, 2015

Sometimes we need to run kube-up.sh again and again when something wrong. We should skip downloading binaries if the specified version already exists.

@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for the commit author(s). If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 1, 2015

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? (reply "ok to test", or if you trust the user, reply "add to whitelist")

If this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

1 similar comment
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 1, 2015

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? (reply "ok to test", or if you trust the user, reply "add to whitelist")

If this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Labelling this PR as size/M

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 1, 2015
@wiwiwa
Copy link
Author

wiwiwa commented Dec 1, 2015

I have already signed CLA. Can anybody tell why googlebot thinks I did not sign the agreement?

@eparis
Copy link
Contributor

eparis commented Dec 1, 2015

The google bot compares the e-mail listed in the commit message with the e-mail that signed the CLA.

@eparis
Copy link
Contributor

eparis commented Dec 1, 2015

I guess it is also possible that the bot gets confused because your git commit has an e-mail but no name. Instead of the typical Name <email@email.email> format. (I'm not a googler)

@eparis
Copy link
Contributor

eparis commented Dec 1, 2015

@dalanlan your thoughts?

@wiwiwa
Copy link
Author

wiwiwa commented Dec 2, 2015

ok, thank you for your answer. I will try next time

2015-12-01 23:49 GMT+08:00 Eric Paris notifications@github.com:

@dalanlan https://github.com/dalanlan your thoughts?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#18002 (comment)
.

mkdir -p binaries/master
mkdir -p binaries/minion

# flannel
FLANNEL_VERSION=${FLANNEL_VERSION:-"0.5.3"}
echo "Prepare flannel ${FLANNEL_VERSION} release ..."
if [ ! -f flannel.tar.gz ] ; then
grep -q "^$FLANNEL_VERSION\$" binaries/.flannel 2>/dev/null || {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

braces, please

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I don't understand. Where to add braces?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

${FLANNEL_VERSION}
Mainly a style thing.

@dalanlan
Copy link
Contributor

dalanlan commented Dec 2, 2015

Thanks for fixing this. Only a few nits.

@eparis
Copy link
Contributor

eparis commented Dec 2, 2015

Could you squash and make sure the author information is correct so the cla bot will be good? It seems that the author is good for the second commit, but not for the original.

Thank you!

@eparis
Copy link
Contributor

eparis commented Dec 2, 2015

@k8s-bot ok to test

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 2, 2015

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit bdceb9ce52f459985c23066da01c69680ee784d8.

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

@googlebot googlebot added cla: yes and removed cla: no labels Dec 3, 2015
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 3, 2015

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit c55ab7d.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

The author of this PR is not in the whitelist for merge, can one of the admins add the 'ok-to-merge' label?

@eparis eparis added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-merge and removed needs-ok-to-merge labels Dec 3, 2015
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2015
Auto commit by PR queue bot
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 8c182c2 into kubernetes:master Dec 3, 2015
@wiwiwa wiwiwa deleted the systemd branch December 4, 2015 01:15
openshift-publish-robot pushed a commit to openshift/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2018
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

UPSTREAM: 56506: kubelet: include runtime error in event on CreatePodSandbox failure

kubernetes#56506

xref https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506813

Origin-commit: 3d701d8b932b32e9a8f335f6f1a79d8084dca75f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants