-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add integration test for VolumeRestriction in requeueing scenarios #127892
Add integration test for VolumeRestriction in requeueing scenarios #127892
Conversation
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Maybe we can also add cases for |
024deae
to
2185f74
Compare
Added the simple scenario for |
/lgtm /cc @sanposhiho |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 6e48d190e71da92a75e5ae544d6b8ad13650858c
|
2185f74
to
58ed769
Compare
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 8ca99e6961bf125c6bf95670520ad45a91c77bc8
|
LGTM, but please rebase; #127607 is now merged and |
Signed-off-by: utam0k <k0ma@utam0k.jp>
58ed769
to
60c29c3
Compare
Sure! Done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 0bd2148e4e5d9a7ff43730bea36790da4ff97899
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sanposhiho, utam0k The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add integration test for VolumeRestriction in requeueing scenarios
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #122305
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: