Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: fix README instructions to load the output image tar #125674

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2024

Conversation

flavianmissi
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

Ran into an issue when following the build docs and trying to run a custom build of kube-controller-manager on my kind cluster. Found it reported here: #118231 (comment). The comment states we need to use docker load instead of docker import, which I confirmed works as expected.
This changes the docs so they reflect this.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 24, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @flavianmissi. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 24, 2024
@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 28, 2024
@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

/sig release

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 28, 2024
build/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@BenTheElder BenTheElder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve
thank you!!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: cdf9e9de3c4adeae6d3cab918e6eeff1975742aa

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, flavianmissi, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 26, 2024
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/triage accepted
/priority important-longterm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 26, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Jul 26, 2024

Docs only change, cc @kubernetes/release-team
/milestone v1.31

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.31 milestone Jul 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 86e2e26 into kubernetes:master Jul 26, 2024
14 checks passed
@flavianmissi flavianmissi deleted the builds-doc branch July 29, 2024 12:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants