Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix pod-index label name for StatefulSet Pods #125502

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

mas9612
Copy link
Contributor

@mas9612 mas9612 commented Jun 14, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

#119232 introduces pod-index label for StatefulSet Pods.

However, differences occurred between the code and the changelog.
This PR fixes that.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. labels Jun 14, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jun 14, 2024

CLA Signed


The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @mas9612!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kubernetes 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kubernetes has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mas9612. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 14, 2024
@mas9612 mas9612 force-pushed the fix-changelog-1.28 branch from b46201f to bcd1d84 Compare June 14, 2024 07:29
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 14, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 12, 2024
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 20, 2024
@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor

mimowo commented Sep 23, 2024

LGTM, but I'm note sure there is point updating the change log now, since this will probably not update it here: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/releases. Also 1.28 is EOL nest month ( 2024-10-28 ) https://kubernetes.io/releases/patch-releases/#1-28

@mas9612
Copy link
Contributor Author

mas9612 commented Sep 24, 2024

Thank you for the review!
I happened to notice it while at work earlier and if it is no longer needed, please close it without merging.

@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor

mimowo commented Sep 25, 2024

I'm not 100% sure about the policy here, so let me check with release managers
/cc @kubernetes/release-managers

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from a team September 25, 2024 10:06
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Sep 26, 2024

@mimowo Updating changelogs is generally considered fine at least for the supported releases (and we can count 1.28 as supported in this context). But to complete the process, you would also need to cherry-pick this change to the release-1.28 branch. That said, if you folks want to proceed with this PR, it should be fine.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Sep 26, 2024

I'm personally 👍 for updating this. It might not seem like a whole lot, but for folks actually going through changelogs this might be a time saver. I'm not sure about the mechanics of this PR, especially about the feasibility of a cherry-pick, but I'll let the release managers to deal with that.

With my sig-apps hat on - I approve 😄

@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor

mimowo commented Sep 26, 2024

+1
/lgtm
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: c6d7bf69c99b267e2f9d78c49f025b0e7e752abd

Copy link
Member

@xmudrii xmudrii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the fix @mas9612, and for the feedback @soltysh @mimowo!
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mas9612, xmudrii

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mas9612: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-integration bcd1d84 link unknown /test pull-kubernetes-integration

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor

mimowo commented Sep 26, 2024

/test pull-kubernetes-integration

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 514de36 into kubernetes:master Sep 26, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.32 milestone Sep 26, 2024
@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor

mimowo commented Sep 26, 2024

@mas9612 please prepare the cherry-pick PR for 1.28

@mas9612
Copy link
Contributor Author

mas9612 commented Sep 27, 2024

Thank you!
I created cherry-pick PR #127674

k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
…502-upstream-release-1.28

Automated cherry pick of #125502: fix pod index label name
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants