-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changelog-1.25: add 1.25.0 known issues section #112106
Changelog-1.25: add 1.25.0 known issues section #112106
Conversation
@kikisdeliveryservice: This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
4fa37f8
to
5e81b21
Compare
5e81b21
to
8a8d7d3
Compare
- Add known issue affecting LocalStorageCapacityIsolationFSQuotaMonitoring
8a8d7d3
to
a9be883
Compare
@pacoxu @rphillips PTAL and lmk if you'd like any updates to the wording :) |
/cc |
I am still working on the bug reproduction and fix. The description is LGTM. |
@rphillips PTAL |
Kep is also being updated: kubernetes/enhancements#3485 |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cici37, kikisdeliveryservice The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
/kind regression
What this PR does / why we need it:
Need to document the reversion of LocalStorageCapacityIsolationFSQuotaMonitoring from beta to alpha
Reverted in master via: #112076
Reverted in 1.25 via: #112078
Open k/k tracking issue for bug: #112081
Related enhancement: kubernetes/enhancements#1029
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: