Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[k8s.io] Pod Disks Should schedule a pod w/ a readonly PD on two hosts, then remove both gracefully. [Slow] {Kubernetes e2e suite} #38201

Closed
k8s-github-robot opened this issue Dec 6, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage.
Milestone

Comments

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-soak-gci-gce-1.5-test/70/

Failed: [k8s.io] Pod Disks Should schedule a pod w/ a readonly PD on two hosts, then remove both gracefully. [Slow] {Kubernetes e2e suite}

/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/pd.go:309
Expected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc4203d4d00>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
not to have occurred
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/pd.go:296

Previous issues for this test: #28297 #37101

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. labels Dec 6, 2016
@jingxu97
Copy link
Contributor

jingxu97 commented Dec 6, 2016

Checked the log, the root cause is due to the shared mounts created by rkt container used in gci mounter, unmountdevice failed and controller will force to detach the volume cause the file system corruption. The PR should help fix the issue #38124

@calebamiles calebamiles added the sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. label Feb 27, 2017
@calebamiles calebamiles modified the milestone: v1.6 Mar 3, 2017
@saad-ali
Copy link
Member

saad-ali commented Mar 9, 2017

Closing old non-recurring flake

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants