-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[k8s.io] Kubectl client [k8s.io] Simple pod should support exec through an HTTP proxy {Kubernetes e2e suite} #30489
Comments
Failed: [k8s.io] Kubectl client [k8s.io] Simple pod should support exec through an HTTP proxy {Kubernetes e2e suite}
Happened on a presubmit run in #30814. |
Failed: [k8s.io] Kubectl client [k8s.io] Simple pod should support exec through an HTTP proxy {Kubernetes e2e suite}
|
The initial comment (#30489 (comment)) wasn't related to exec at all - BeforeEach failed trying to run a pod. I'm unable to locate the appropriate data in the log files to triage. The error from the second comment ( For the last comment, I assume that @pwittrock I don't know how to resolve this flake. What do you recommend doing here? |
[FLAKE-PING] @ncdc This flaky-test issue would love to have more attention... |
@pwittrock bump if you have a moment |
@bprashanth Would you be able to help @ncdc on this, or find someone who can? |
@ncdc Apologies for my unresponsiveness. Thank you for following up on this. |
I'm not That familiar with exec, ignore that last one till I or someone has time to dig since it's GKE (@cjcullen), the previous failures should be standard kubectl exec (it still uses spdy right?). |
[FLAKE-PING] @ncdc This flaky-test issue would love to have more attention. |
@bprashanth it turns out that If you look at the apiserver log, you see these entries one right after the other:
There's something strange going on:
I'm not sure why there is a gap of over 1 minute between the time kubectl got a response from the apiserver and when the apiserver considered the request finished. I'm also still not sure why one of these exec requests didn't get any data. Maybe the latter is similar to whatever is going on in #27680. @smarterclayton any ideas why the apiserver has a huge gap in logging the hijacking? |
Nothing comes to mind
|
[FLAKE-PING] @ncdc This flaky-test issue would love to have more attention. |
2 similar comments
[FLAKE-PING] @ncdc This flaky-test issue would love to have more attention. |
[FLAKE-PING] @ncdc This flaky-test issue would love to have more attention. |
https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/kubernetes-soak-continuous-e2e-gke/8167/
Failed: [k8s.io] Kubectl client [k8s.io] Simple pod should support exec through an HTTP proxy {Kubernetes e2e suite}
Previous issues for this test: #27156 #28979
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: