Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support VMWare in Vagrantfile #2741

Closed
jameskyle opened this issue Dec 3, 2014 · 8 comments
Closed

Support VMWare in Vagrantfile #2741

jameskyle opened this issue Dec 3, 2014 · 8 comments
Labels
area/platform/vagrant priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle.

Comments

@jameskyle
Copy link
Contributor

It'd be nice to support vmware in the vagrant file.

Pull request incoming.

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added status/help-wanted priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. area/platform/vagrant labels Dec 6, 2014
@jameskyle
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm going to get this done. I got distracted by a new 👶 for a couple of weeks.

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added the sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. label Feb 28, 2015
@posita
Copy link
Contributor

posita commented Apr 15, 2015

@jameskyle Congratulations on your 👶! I wanted support for Parallels, and thought I'd bang out both at the same time. I didn't see any branches addressing this issue in jameskyle/kubernetes, but I hope I didn't step on any toes? 😬 Check out PR #6879 #6983. I don't have VMWare, so perhaps you can help me test that part? 🙏

@jameskyle
Copy link
Contributor Author

My toes are fully intact. Apparently raising these little tykes takes significant time and can be a bit disruptive to plans. Who knew!

I actually do have a branch locally and had made some headway. I'll compare to your branch.

@posita
Copy link
Contributor

posita commented Apr 17, 2015

@jameskyle, it looks like my PR was merged (that was fast), but please reopen this if there's something that I missed, especially on the VMWare side.

@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member

If there are issues unique to the non VirtualBox provider, who is signing up to maintain that? I am fine keeping the general Vagrant setup stable, but I am unable to debug issues specific to virtualization tool.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Matt Bogosian (formerly @mbogosian) notifications@github.com wrote:

@jameskyle, it looks like my PR was merged (that was fast), but please reopen this if there's something that I missed, especially on the VMWare side.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@posita
Copy link
Contributor

posita commented Apr 18, 2015

If there are issues unique to the non VirtualBox provider, who is signing up to maintain that? I am fine keeping the general Vagrant setup stable, but I am unable to debug issues specific to virtualization tool.

Perhaps only VirtualBox will be "officially supported" and the rest will be "community supported"? This ain't my rodeo 🏇, but it seems like with many aspects of Kubernetes, those making use of particular features can contribute to their maintenance? It appears that's how this issue and my attempt at a fix came about in the first place. The volume of this project is explosive (just look at the number of external merges in the past 24 hours 😮; it's insane). Don't underestimate the efficiency of emergent markets. ☺️

Between me and @jameskyle (when he's not busy being a 👨 tending to his 👶), we can probably make a pretty big dent in any issues that arise. Feel free to assign any non-VirtualBox Vagrant issues to me. If I can't handle them within a reasonable time, maybe someone else can take a stab?

Cc: @legal90 (hint, hint) 😏

@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member

Thanks

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 17, 2015, at 10:06 PM, Matt Bogosian (formerly @mbogosian) notifications@github.com wrote:

If there are issues unique to the non VirtualBox provider, who is signing up to maintain that? I am fine keeping the general Vagrant setup stable, but I am unable to debug issues specific to virtualization tool.

Perhaps only VirtualBox will be "officially supported" and the rest will be "community supported"? This ain't my rodeo , but it seems like with many aspects of Kubernetes, those making use of particular features can contribute to their maintenance? It appears that's how this issue and my attempt at a fix came about in the first place. The volume of this project is explosive (just look at the number of external merges in the past 24 hours ; it's insane). Don't underestimate the efficiency of emergent markets.

Between me and @jameskyle (when he's not busy being a tending to his ), we can probably make a pretty big dent in any issues that arise. Feel free to assign any non-VirtualBox Vagrant issues to me. If I can't handle them within a reasonable time, maybe someone else can take a stab?

Cc: @legal90 (hint, hint)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@legal90
Copy link

legal90 commented Apr 18, 2015

@derekwaynecarr @posita Yes, I can help with issues related to Parallels Desktop for Mac and to the provider for Vagrant ("vagrant-parallels")

xingzhou pushed a commit to xingzhou/kubernetes that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2016
…are Fusion, VMWare Workstation, and Parallels.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/platform/vagrant priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants