Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Control the Pnpm dependencies tree depth #807

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2024

Conversation

attiasas
Copy link
Contributor

@attiasas attiasas commented Dec 23, 2024

  • All tests passed. If this feature is not already covered by the tests, I added new tests.
  • This pull request is on the dev branch.
  • I used gofmt for formatting the code before submitting the pull request.
  • Update documentation about new features / new supported technologies

You can now pass JF_PNPM_MAX_TREE_DEPTH to control the max depth of the Pnpm dependency tree generated.

@attiasas attiasas added safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request improvement Automatically generated release notes labels Dec 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Dec 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

👍 Frogbot scanned this pull request and did not find any new security issues.


@eyalk007 eyalk007 merged commit 20eeb63 into jfrog:dev Dec 29, 2024
39 checks passed
@attiasas attiasas added new feature Automatically generated release notes improvement Automatically generated release notes and removed improvement Automatically generated release notes new feature Automatically generated release notes labels Jan 7, 2025
@attiasas attiasas changed the title Add option to control the Pnpm dependencies tree depth Control the Pnpm dependencies tree depth Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Automatically generated release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants