Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cosmos: Add Serverless account type support #244

Closed
OmnipotentOwl opened this issue Sep 29, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #245
Closed

Cosmos: Add Serverless account type support #244

OmnipotentOwl opened this issue Sep 29, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #245

Comments

@OmnipotentOwl
Copy link
Contributor

eqx init cosmos currently does not support the provisioning of the equinox container on a Serverless account type. By enabling support for serverless account types this will allow lower cost development and testing on Azure based Cosmos DB Accounts.

Serverless Requirements:

  • When provisioning a serverless containers you are not allowed to configure the RUs for the container
  • When using a serverless account you cannot read the provisioned RUs for a container or database and doing so returns an error.
  • You cannot create a shared throughput database in a serverless account and doing so returns an error

Relevant Documents:

bartelink pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2020
* Add configuration for init tool to support Cosmos DB Serverless accounts.
* Update inline help text to include default value if not provided.
bartelink pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2020
* Add configuration for init tool to support Cosmos DB Serverless accounts.
* Update inline help text to include default value if not provided.
bartelink pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2020
* Add configuration for init tool to support Cosmos DB Serverless accounts.
* Update inline help text to include default value if not provided.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant