Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mention content license in site footer #922

Merged

Conversation

Minoru
Copy link
Collaborator

@Minoru Minoru commented Feb 27, 2022

The link leads to the latest commit on GitHub because:

  1. I want to link to our own version, which has the copyright holder's
    name filled in, and also has minor changes in wording (s/its
    contributors/other contributors/);

  2. I want to link to the latest version, since it gets updated from time
    to time to bump copyright years.

Fixes #920.

The link leads to the latest commit on GitHub because:

1) I want to link to our own version, which has the copyright holder's
   name filled in, and also has minor changes in wording (s/its
   contributors/other contributors/);

2) I want to link to the latest version, since it gets updated from time
   to time to bump copyright years.

Fixes jaspervdj#920.
@Minoru Minoru requested a review from jaspervdj February 27, 2022 20:50
@Minoru Minoru mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2022
@throwaway1037
Copy link

Awesome, although a term like "materials" or "files" or "pages" would be better than "content".

@Minoru
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Minoru commented Feb 28, 2022

@throwaway1037 Suggested alternatives sound too formal to me, so I'll stick with "content" for now. Thanks for the link though, I didn't know FSF has a position on this!

@Minoru Minoru merged commit 4cc9445 into jaspervdj:master Feb 28, 2022
@Minoru Minoru deleted the feature/920-mention-license-in-footer branch February 28, 2022 20:36
@throwaway1037
Copy link

It's GNU, not FSF

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

License clarification
3 participants