Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SYCL] Reorder enum read_write_mode #8248

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

wangdi4
Copy link
Contributor

@wangdi4 wangdi4 commented Feb 8, 2023

Reorder read_write_mode_enum to be consistent with SPIR-V Access Qualifier

@wangdi4 wangdi4 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 8, 2023 13:09
@wangdi4 wangdi4 requested a review from dm-vodopyanov February 8, 2023 13:09
@wangdi4 wangdi4 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 8, 2023 13:11
@gmlueck
Copy link
Contributor

gmlueck commented Feb 8, 2023

Spec change is OK. Note that this is an ABI break. We allow ABI breaks for "experimental" features, so this is not a showstopper, though.

I see that the specification is in the "proposed" directory, but it seems like there is also some implementation. Is this extension fully implemented at this point? Is it being used? If so, it should be moved to "experimental".

@wangdi4 wangdi4 temporarily deployed to aws February 8, 2023 14:43 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@dm-vodopyanov dm-vodopyanov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, provided that @gmlueck question above will be addressed.

@wangdi4 wangdi4 temporarily deployed to aws February 9, 2023 05:55 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@bader bader merged commit e9efd5c into intel:sycl Feb 9, 2023
@wangdi4 wangdi4 deleted the reorder_enum branch February 10, 2023 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants