Add option to provide a template when exporting via the cli #208
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
volker-fr
commented
Dec 31, 2024
| ``` | ||
| ┌— hamza@AURORAONE C:\Users\hamza | ||
| └———→ slack-export-viewer-cli clean | ||
| An example template can be found in the repositories [`slackviewer/templates/example_template_single_export.html`](https://github.com/hfaran/slack-export-viewer/tree/master/slackviewer/templates/example_template_single_export.html) file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This link will work after the PR got merged.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Provide the option to provide a template when running
slack-export-viewer-cli export.The template example is based on combining
templates/util.html,templates/export_single.htmlandstatic/viewer.css.The css is always handed over, but not utilized in the
example_template_single_export.html. This allows better integration of this change over having an additional feature flag just for the css -- that gets later embedded into the single file anyway.