Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

interop-testing: Use normal runtimeOnly dep for xds #7200

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 14, 2020

Conversation

ejona86
Copy link
Member

@ejona86 ejona86 commented Jul 10, 2020

This prevents grpc-xds and its transitive dependencies from being included
twice in distTar and distZip, which reduces the size from 60 MB to 40 MB. It
does mean that interop-testing as a whole depends on xds, but that should not
be an issue any longer. It was an issue before we started providing grpc-xds on
Maven Central.

This prevents grpc-xds and its transitive dependencies from being included
twice in distTar and distZip, which reduces the size from 60 MB to 40 MB. It
does mean that interop-testing as a whole depends on xds, but that should not
be an issue any longer. It was an issue before we started providing grpc-xds on
Maven Central.
@dapengzhang0
Copy link
Member

Is the GAE Interop failure legit?

@ejona86
Copy link
Member Author

ejona86 commented Jul 13, 2020

@dapengzhang0, yes, the GAE failure is legit.

@ejona86 ejona86 merged commit 3a43abe into grpc:master Jul 14, 2020
@ejona86 ejona86 deleted the interop-normal-xds-dep branch July 14, 2020 20:25
dfawley pushed a commit to dfawley/grpc-java that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2021
This prevents grpc-xds and its transitive dependencies from being included
twice in distTar and distZip, which reduces the size from 60 MB to 40 MB. It
does mean that interop-testing as a whole depends on xds, but that should not
be an issue any longer. It was an issue before we started providing grpc-xds on
Maven Central.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants